NAP avec les TGT

J attend votre avis en ce qui concerne ce NAP

Dans mon souvenir, on a tjs été en bons termes avec eux non?

Je vote pour, ça pourrait nous être utile!

Je vote pour, mais rapelle que rien ne nous laisse penser que TGT est intéressé. Il s'agit juste de leur proposer.

alors proposons!

+1 pour

J ai pas de nouvelles des TGT, je me suis donc inscrit sur leur forum et a mon grand plaisir j'ai vu que xeno a l'air de s'occuper du forum

Je vais donc leur proposer un nap sur leur forum

Je vous tiens au courant

pour info, TGT et PUNX sont napés avec AA

Ok, je comprend mieux le mutisme maintenant,

Je crois que l'on a des chances de servir de puching ball ce round

J'espere que les AA n'ont pas eu vent de tes propositions

ben je regarde les map et à part des AA je connais personne dans le coin
et les AA que je connais c pas évident qu'ils voudraient me napper (enfin pas tous)
pis je me méfie maintenant à astrowars de temps en temps tes potes ils trouvent fun de te fighter.

rrfirebird wrote:

Je crois que l'on a des chances de servir de puching ball ce round

à ce propos,toujours pas d'autre nouvelles recrues possible?
quels sont les critères à part le nombre de log?

une race de fighter moyen genre +4 +2, +3 +3 dans des compétences att/speed/def est un plus. Joueur parlant français est un plus, pour ne pas devoir réadapter tout le forum.

i try to do a nap with their

i post a lot on their forum
and i just have pm from muscleman

i think it's good to nap them

You're right!

Good work anyway!

ça y est l'ambassade est ouverte
je viens de demander un nap

the ambassy is open
i just ask a nap
just say we have a nap with bla because they known that

http://thegalacticthugz.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewforum&f=136

yin wrote:

hello
i'm happy to see you open us an ambassy now
thx to everybody i have disturbed for Laughing

We have a Nap with BLA and they say us you too
we are only 8 (encalme SergioV metch zottestef rrfirebird yinchekhsia pierrovitch and Otteson)
so we prefer a nap with you to
we are not yet war but seek a little alliance to fight with heu no against
Laughing

i hope you want too

muscleman wrote:

Hello and thank you for your patience. Sorry fo the delay. Who else are you NAPed with? And what would be the conditions of the NAP?

Thanks,
MM

yin wrote:

standart conditions
no fight eachother
no give ir or jump
no take planet in a system where one as planet
if there is system with TGT and BONO say launch of fleet

possible bono and tgt on same system but ask and wait positive reply before launch

i don't want give us another nap
a idea of nap who can say for not affraid him ?

Tu sais traduire tes 2 dernières lignes en français? J'comprend pas ce que tu veux dire!...

Quote :

i don't want give us another nap
a idea of nap who can say for not affraid him ?

j'ai pas envie de leur dire avec qui on est nappé
vous avez une idée des nap qu'on peut dévoiler sans les effrayer




c sur j'ai eu du mal a comprendre

You can say that we are naped with allpeople excepted AA

in fact i guess they are just nap with AA not allied

Quote :

187james

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:34 am
What are your terms?

_________________

g0didam

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 5:32 pm
James - in other thread

Quote :

standart conditions
no fight eachother
no give ir or jump
no take planet in a system where one as planet
if there is system with TGT and BONO say launch of fleet

possible bono and tgt on same system but ask and wait positive reply before launch

also - we need expansion area.
if we NAP you we are surrounded by NAP'd alliances, limiting our expansion. What systems to your west are you willing to share?
for example are you willing to split Beta Hatysa [1846] (-64/-4Cool 6 planets for BONO and 6 for TGT?

Same for Beta Deneb Algiedi [2016] (-66/-32) 6 each?

_________________
yinchekhsia2

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:47 pm

i think there is a lot of planet at west but more easy for us, then ok to share the 2 system 6/6 each.
if you need more free on south and west it's possible to contact us Wink
Beta Hatysa [1846] pm otteson and encalme before launch
Beta Deneb Algiedi [2016]

Quote :

ID : 2016 | Beta Deneb Algiedi(-66/-32)
ID Owner Tag
1 SergioV BONO
2 SergioV BONO
3 TGT
4 TGT
5 yinchekhsia BONO
6 TGT
7 TGT
8 TGT
9 TGT
10 BONO
11 BONO
12 BONO

because we siege every planet of this system in pledge of goodwill

best regard
Yin

I'm ok with it, but the first thing we must be sure is that we sign the nap AFTER our attack of this night... Otherwise we'll have some problem in attacking systems shared between TGT and AA!

that i received from adnedarn:

Quote :

Hi, it is posted in our forums that we are welcome to some planets in this system as a part of our NAP. So we are inbound to them. This is how it is shown in our forum:

Quote:

Beta Hatysa (-64/-48 )
ID Population Starbase Owner
1 0 0 Free Planet <--- TGT
2 6 0 Otteson [BONO]
3 8 0 unknown <--- TGT
4 8 0 unknown <--- TGT
5 9 0 Otteson [BONO]
6 8 0 unknown <--- TGT
7 0 0 Free Planet <--- TGT
8 9 0 zottestef [BONO]
9 6 0 encalme [BONO]
10 0 0 Free Planet
11 8 0 unknown <--- TGT
12 0 0 Free Planet




Is this not correct? I'm VERY sorry about colliding with you!!

i don´t agree with that occupation plans
what the hack is going on here

From: encalme
To: adnedarn
Posted: 18 Feb 2007 19:38
Subject: F***** plan
Stop launching, We don't want to give you all unknow planet there

Quote :

Quote:
Hi, it is posted in our forums that we are welcome to some planets in this system as a part of our NAP. So we are inbound to them. This is how it is shown in our forum:

Quote:

Beta Hatysa (-64/-48 )
ID Population Starbase Owner
1 0 0 Free Planet <--- TGT
2 6 0 Otteson [BONO]
3 8 0 unknown <--- TGT
4 8 0 unknown <--- TGT
5 9 0 Otteson [BONO]
6 8 0 unknown <--- TGT
7 0 0 Free Planet <--- TGT
8 9 0 zottestef [BONO]
9 6 0 encalme [BONO]
10 0 0 Free Planet
11 8 0 unknown <--- TGT
12 0 0 Free Planet




Is this not correct? I'm VERY sorry about colliding with you!!

next message:

Quote :

From: 187james
To: Otteson
Posted: 18 Feb 2007 18:52
Subject: TGT
Well im not sure whats going on with your diplomat right now......we had thought we had a NAP with your alliance.

If we do not have a NAP then we very well may go to war with BONO for going into our home systems.

Here is a link to our site , please make an account and ill give you access to the BONO embassy....then you could read what was promised to us and get a better idea of where we are coming from.

http://thegalacticthugz.org/index.php


187james[TGT] Chief Diplomat

do we have a NAP with TGT or not???
i can not see them in our nap-list

and another one:

Quote :

From: muscleman
To: Otteson
Posted: 18 Feb 2007 18:19
Subject: hello
I see that you are having problems with andedarn. The NAP between our 2 alliances has been agreed. We were discussing the divying up of planets. the one system that was a point of contention was Planets at Beta Tyl (-62/-50). Yin. said no so we agreed but he assigned 12 to us and said we could launch at will. Also, it is not an act of agression bc fleets crashed. We were told to enter the system as where you have 2 of your players enter here:

Planets at Alpha Mothallah (-54/-39)
ID Population Starbase Owner
1 9 0 GigantusX
2 1 0 zottestef
3 1 0 pierrovitch
4 1 0 pierrovitch
5 7 0 GigantusX
6 7 0 radevic
7 11 0 adnedarn
8 12 0 adnedarn
9 11 0 adnedarn
10 12 0 adnedarn
11 13 2 adnedarn
12 11 0 adnedarn


WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION. So, we both are back at square 1. sorry you lost some fleet but we need those planets. those are the terms of the NAP. I doubt you want to fight another alliance.

and my answer to muscleman:

Quote :

oh man, if i could see this NAP and if of course you guys would have informed me and or encalme about your moves there wasn´t any problems at all

but thats´s not the case
and you should know that there is a difference in fighting enemies like our guys did at alpha motallah and then take their planets and what you did with our system

come on you can´t be such naive

the message was pretty clear: you have to inform us BEFORE launch and you didn´t
that is NOT the behaviour of a NAP-partner as you may agree

So please stop your moves immediately